What's New in 2024 with PostgreSQL's "Deadly" Transaction Wraparound Problem?
The risk of encountering the infamous Transaction Wraparound problem in PostgreSQL has never been lower. Thanks to new testing tools and improved performance in PostgreSQL 17, DBAs managing the highest throughput PostgreSQL databases out there have less to worry about than ever.
I have a personal vendetta with this problem. During my tenure at a previous company, transaction wraparound caused significant inefficiencies in our query-based change data capture (CDC) pipeline. To fully grasp the issue's impact, I dove deep into the PostgreSQL source code and ultimately developed a custom fork. The fork modified the hard-coded "MaxTransactionId" from its default of ~4 billion to ~1 million, enabling our development team to simulate wraparound scenarios in seconds rather than minutesâdramatically streamlining our testing process [1]. While I had lots of fun working on that project, the new xid_wraparound extension covered below fortunately makes it unnecessary to go to such lengths!
The extension consume XIDs both incrementally (similar to past approaches [2]) and introduces a shortcut method that can increment the transaction ID counter in large steps as long as no "interesting" values are skipped. [3]
Leave a Comment
Related Posts
Dmitrii on Twitter: "Let's talk about the Web, UIs and layout. I often hear: well, it's an amazing layout system. If there's anything lacking, show me anything that works under the same constraints: having to work with multiple screen sizes and adapt to them seamlessly. Well, a thread𧔠1/"
Comment
Jasper on Twitter: "got the Source Engine implementation running under latest WebGPU. these include some of the most complicated materials & shaders in noclip. it's exciting because it doesn't look any different!⊠https://t.co/wz27v8XfMm"
Comment
shachaf on Twitter: "Here are some algorithms I like that can be explained in 15 minutes, aren't part of baseline CS knowledge, and do something surprising. What else should be on this list?"
Comment
