Scientific Reports                          volume  13, Article number: 22849  (2023 )             Cite this article

Verbal lie detection using Large Language Models

submited by
Style Pass
2024-04-18 16:30:04

Scientific Reports volume  13, Article number: 22849 (2023 ) Cite this article

Human accuracy in detecting deception with intuitive judgments has been proven to not go above the chance level. Therefore, several automatized verbal lie detection techniques employing Machine Learning and Transformer models have been developed to reach higher levels of accuracy. This study is the first to explore the performance of a Large Language Model, FLAN-T5 (small and base sizes), in a lie-detection classification task in three English-language datasets encompassing personal opinions, autobiographical memories, and future intentions. After performing stylometric analysis to describe linguistic differences in the three datasets, we tested the small- and base-sized FLAN-T5 in three Scenarios using 10-fold cross-validation: one with train and test set coming from the same single dataset, one with train set coming from two datasets and the test set coming from the third remaining dataset, one with train and test set coming from all the three datasets. We reached state-of-the-art results in Scenarios 1 and 3, outperforming previous benchmarks. The results revealed also that model performance depended on model size, with larger models exhibiting higher performance. Furthermore, stylometric analysis was performed to carry out explainability analysis, finding that linguistic features associated with the Cognitive Load framework may influence the model’s predictions.

Lie detection involves the process of determining the veracity of a given communication. When producing deceptive narratives, liars employ verbal strategies to create false beliefs in the interacting partners and are thus involved in a specific and temporary psychological and emotional state1. For this reason, the Undeutsch hypothesis suggests that deceptive narratives differ in form and content from truthful narratives2. This topic has always been under constant investigation and development in the field of cognitive psychology, given its significant and promising applications in the forensic and legal setting3. Its potential pivotal role is in determining the honesty of witnesses and potential suspects during investigations and legal proceedings, impacting both the investigative information-gathering process and the final decision-making level4.

Leave a Comment