The emergence of egalitarianism in a model of early human societies

submited by
Style Pass
2024-10-24 18:00:17

How did egalitarianism emerge in early human societies? In contrast to dominance hierarchies in non-human primates, human simple forager bands are typically egalitarian, with male hunters often serving as the collective alpha. Here we present a thermodynamics-inspired simple population model, based on stochastic optimization of dominance relationships, in which a dominance hierarchy of individuals with exclusively self-centered characteristics (the desire to dominate, resentment at being dominated) transitions spontaneously to egalitarianism as their capacity for language develops. Language, specifically gossip, allows resentment against being dominated to promote the formation of antidominance coalitions which destabilize the alpha position for individuals, leading to a phase transition in which a coalition of the full population suddenly becomes dominant. Thus, egalitarianism emerges suddenly as the optimal power-sharing arrangement in a population of selfish individuals without any inherently altruistic qualities. We speculate that egalitarianism driven by punishment for exhibiting alpha-like behavior may then set the stage for genuinely altruistic traits to propagate as predicted by game theory models. Based on model simulations, we also predict that egalitarianism is a pre-condition for adaptation of tools as weapons. Potential implications for origins of human moral belief systems are discussed.

Non-human primates generally form hierarchal social communities with either dominant individuals (alphas) or small coalitions at the top and lower-ranking individuals below [1]. In contrast, extant small-scale human simple forager bands of mobile hunter-gatherers, who arguably resemble the earliest human communities in the late Pleistocene era [1, 2], typically exhibit egalitarian power-sharing among male hunters, who make major decisions by consensus [3, 4]. In these egalitarian anti-dominance coalitions, political power is shared equitably, with a variety of cultural status leveling mechanisms (ridicule, ostracism, shunning, exile and execution) discouraging individuals from adopting alpha-like behavior. In effect, a coalition of the weak enforces a moral code that keeps aggressive upstarts from selfishly dominating the group to monopolize reproductive and other resources. These egalitarian simple forager bands typically range in size from 20–30 related and unrelated individuals, although they also form larger networks of bands. After bands coalesce into tribes, chiefdoms and states with hundreds or thousands of members, however, such communal decision-making becomes increasingly unwieldy, and dominance hierarchies commonly reappear in the form of big men, chiefs, kings, dictators and political leaders [3, 4].

Leave a Comment