New Directions in Pooh Studies

submited by
Style Pass
2021-09-12 19:30:05

Union is all about mission – mission fuelled and strengthened by robust theology . To see the worldwide church grow, we need to raise godly, wise and well-equipped leaders. We recruit, raise and help deploy these leaders, providing them with rigorous, biblical and accessible education, training and resources. Union operates in four interrelating departments:

Welcome to the Union Publishing site. This website provides quality theological material for the whole church, for free. Whether you’re looking for a podcast to enjoy on your commute, or an academic paper for your studies, there’s something here for you.

These resources are free for everyone. Whether you’re looking to begin or go deeper, there’s something here to help you grow in faith and the truth.

There is little need, at the present stage of scholarship, to attempt a justification of the principle that the dogma of unitary authorship for works of literature must be totally abandoned. In all confidence we may say that a priori we may expect the Pooh corpus (viz. Winnie-the-Pooh, hereafter abbreviated W, containing traditions of higher antiquity than the Deutero-Pooh book, The House at Pooh Corner, hereafter abbreviated H) to be of composite origin; even if there were such a person as A.A. Milne, traditionally the 'author', we may be sure that he did not write the Pooh books. His name does not occur once within the narratives themselves, and we can hardly be expected to take a title-page, manifestly a later addition, seriously.[1]

Leave a Comment