Autodidact Obsessions
I’ve been testing this axiom you saw me develop the other day. I think it’s original. I’ve been testing it for soundness. Developed here: Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4.
Lee’s First Axiom states: “Until it has been used, language remains in a timeless state of quantum possibility. Words do not have rigid semantic intentions until they have been applied.”
I tried testing this earlier today with Mereological Dialogues, but got sidetracked into an interesting digression. Part 1, Part 2, Part 3.
When prompted to strictly express in symbolic logic within a mereological framework, using cardinals and ordinals, the axiom, we get:
"Until it has been used, language remains in a timeless state of quantum possibility. Words do not have rigid semantic intentions until they have been applied."
2. **Usage (U)** of language, or application of words, as an event that changes the state of language from potential to actual.
