Premium XS Integration, Pt 1 | Nerdvana [blogs.perl.org]

submited by
Style Pass
2025-01-20 11:00:03

There are several competing philosophies for wrapping external C libraries. One is that the XS module should hide all the details of the library and provide a clean “Perlish interface”. The opposite extreme is that the external C functions should be exposed to Perl using an extremely minimal XS layer, or the Foreign Function Interface (FFI) and all the logic for working with the library should be written in Perl.

I advocate something in the middle. I think that a good interface should expose as much of the low-level as possible (to make the most usage of that library possible by other Perl modules) while “padding the sharp edges” so that it is difficult for Perl-side usage to crash the program. Higher level features can be provided in addition to the low level API via XS, Perl modules, or both.

If you consider that the average C library is an awkward mess of state machines and lightly-enforced state requirements that will segfault if not carefully obeyed, wrapping that nicely for the Perl developer is going to require a lot of data translation and runtime sanity checks. If you skip those runtime sanity checks in your wrapper library, it drags down the efficiency of your subsequent Perl development to the level of C development, which is to say, sitting around scratching your head for hours wondering why the program keeps segfaulting. (or attaching gdb to your debug build of perl) If you write those runtime checks in Perl, like with the FFI approach, your runtime performance can suffer significantly. If you write those runtime checks in XS, you can actually do quite a lot of them before there’s any notable decrease in the performance of the script.

Leave a Comment