There are many conventional wisdoms surrounding maximizing citations. With rare exceptions, these largely hold true under scrutiny; however, one oft-m

Publishing in January and Impact on Citations: Does the Data Support the Strategy? - Science Editor

submited by
Style Pass
2024-11-27 21:00:03

There are many conventional wisdoms surrounding maximizing citations. With rare exceptions, these largely hold true under scrutiny; however, one oft-mentioned strategy is the assertion that articles published in January contribute more citations to the Journal Impact Factor (JIF) due to their longer exposure time—sometimes referred to as “issue frontloading.” In its simplest form, the JIF is the average number of times articles published in the last 2 years are cited in a given year. The argument follows that because January-published articles are available to be cited for the largest percentage of this 2-year window, then publishing more content in January leads to a higher JIF.

Firstly, we have never actually seen evidence of this presented at the journal level to prove the theory correct, and secondly, when we have done the occasional analysis illustrating citation distribution over the calendar year, it has never shown that the January issue is the highest contributor to JIF. Figure 1 is an actual example—taken from a recent JIF analysis of a title published by Lippincott, the journal imprint of Wolters Kluwer—of how a journal’s individual issues compare with each other in terms of contribution to JIF. Noticeably, there is no identifiable trend over the course of the calendar year, and January was certainly not the biggest contributor to this journal’s JIF.

The source of this supposed strategy is the assertion that citations are primarily driven by an article’s exposure as measured by time. It is true that citations do roughly follow a predictable pattern, wherein articles remain largely uncited for 6–9 months after publication, with the bulk of citations occurring at 18–36 months, followed by a dramatic decline. Issue frontloading presumes that JIFs can be maximized if a greater portion of the 18–36 peak time can be included in the JIF calculation. However, if this exposure were the only determinant, we would expect to see a consistent (~8%) decline of citation contributions to JIF by month over the course of a single calendar year. If, on the other hand, exposure had no effect on citation contribution, we would expect to see equal citation contributions to JIF across the calendar year (Figure 2). In this analysis, we set out to examine the degree to which exposure drives JIF, and whether issue frontloading is indeed an effective strategy for improving JIF.

Leave a Comment