The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (software) supplementary essay. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar." It was deprodded by User:Gerardnico (see related discussion at User talk:Gerardnico). While I appreciate Gerardnico's interest, I am afraid they failed to either read or understand the cited policies (GNG, NSOFT). The article still fails to demonstrate the notability of the subject, and no evidence of such notability has been presented in the discussion (I am honestly not sure what the spreadsheet Gerardnico created is supposed to demonstrate). The best alternative to deletion I can offer is to suggest draftificaiton of this article in Gerardnico's userspace, but I have serious concern this article will be ever ready to return back to our mainspace as the odds of something happening and making this notable are, IMHO, slim but arguably not zero...). Thoughts? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:27, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
The spreadsheet based on a Google Search is supposed to demonstrate the Wikipedia:General notability guideline points (ie Significant coverage, Reliable, Sources, Independent of the subject, Presumed).