charlesroper / gist:f2da6152d6789fa6f25e9d194a42b889

I've been using Backblaze for a while now as my online backup service. I have used a few others in the past. None were particularly satisfactory until Backblaze came along.

It was - still is - keenly priced at a flat $5 (£4) per month for unlimited backup (I've currently got just under half a terabyte backed-up). It has a fast, reliable client. The company itself is transparent about their operations and generous with their knowledge sharing. To me, this says they understand their customers well. I've never had reliability problems and everything about the outfit exudes a sense of simple, quick, solid quality. The service has even saved the day on a couple of occasions where I've lost files.

So when Backblaze announced they were getting into the cloud storage business, taking on the likes of Amazon S3, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud, I paid attention. Even if the cost were the same, or a little bit more, I'd be interested because I like the company. I like their product, and I like their style.

What I wasn't expecting was for them to be cheaper. Much cheaper. How about 440% cheaper than S3 per GB? Don't believe me? Take a look. Remarkable.

Leave a Comment