Your recent release of the ChatQA-1.5-8B language model raises serious concerns about compliance with the licensing terms for LLaMA 3, the open source

nvidia / ChatQA-1.5-8B like 8

submited by
Style Pass
2024-05-02 14:00:04

Your recent release of the ChatQA-1.5-8B language model raises serious concerns about compliance with the licensing terms for LLaMA 3, the open source model released by Meta AI that your work appears to be derived from.

The LLaMA 3 terms of service explicitly state that any derivative models or products must be named "in a way that clearly indicates their lineage from LLaMA 3." However, the name you have chosen for your 8 billion parameter model, "ChatQA-1.5-8B," makes no mention of its origins from LLaMA 3.

This omission seems to be a direct violation of the licensing requirements Meta has put in place. By obfuscating the connection to LLaMA 3 in the naming, Nvidia appears to be attempting to sidestep the open source licensing terms while benefiting from Meta's publicly released work.

This is a concerning precedent that undermines the principles of open and ethical use of open source AI models. Nvidia needs to be held accountable for this potential breach of license.

Leave a Comment
Related Posts