The US Copyright Office has declined to grant a new exemption to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act that would allow libraries and archives to offer

Video Game History Foundation 'Disappointed' in DMCA Decision That Won't Grant Exemptions for Researchers

submited by
Style Pass
2024-10-25 23:00:02

The US Copyright Office has declined to grant a new exemption to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act that would allow libraries and archives to offer remote, digital access to out-of-market video games for verified researchers.

The proposed amendment, which we wrote extensively about back in May, was championed by the Software Preservation Network (SPN) as critical for game preservation. The group argues that due to equipment, technological, and supply limitations, the lack of digital availability of out-of-market games is a massive hindrance to researchers and academics, who may not live near a library that has a physical copy of a needed game available to check out.

However, groups such as the ESA opposed the amendment, claiming it would harm company's ability to make money off of retro games. In fact, one ESA lawyer argued that there was "[no] combination of limitations [ESA members] would support to provide remote access." In May, we reached out to every member of the ESA for comment on this matter, but only received one response back.

In the end, the Copyright Office sided with the ESA, stating that the SPN "did not show that removing the singleuser limitation for preserved computer programs or permitting off-premises access to video games are likely to be noninfringing." That doesn't mean the exemption is dead - there will be an opportunity to try again in three years, and the Copyright Office's response does seem to invite them to do so: "She recommends clarifying the single copy restriction language to reflect that preservation institutions can allow a copy of a computer program to be accessed by as many individuals as there are circumvented copies legally owned. This clarifying text will address the perceived ambiguity in the current exemption, while maintaining the single-user limitation’s intended purpose to minimize the risk of substitutional uses of preserved computer programs."

Leave a Comment