Outside the Spectrum of Acceptable Opinion | Dig Within
Twenty years ago, I was fired for speaking out about lies related to the crimes of September 11th, 2001. More recently, I lost a job for refusing to be injected with the experimental gene therapies being pushed for Covid. I’m not complaining as there were conscious decisions made in each case. But these incidents highlight the difficulty experienced by anyone who dares to recognize and challenge state crimes. Losing a job is just the beginning of that journey.
It’s one thing to not be able to work because you won’t go along with deceit and it’s another thing to live with people who willfully ignore state crimes. Even if you find a way to work, you have to interact with many others who avoid any thoughts that are out of their comfort zone. If you don’t just go along to get along, how can you interact and talk to others without it all being depressingly superficial?
With most people you can’t talk about “conspiracy theories” unless it’s just a joke. Ha—obviously rich and powerful people don’t engage in conspiracies! Instead, you can only talk to people about things like the weather or the price of tomatoes. But some say the weather is being controlled and that tomatoes are coated with poisons so don’t bring up those topics. And you can’t talk about politics in any form without realizing that your framework for discussion is strictly limited to “the spectrum of acceptable opinion” as Chomsky ironically put it.
