Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.    By click

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

submited by
Style Pass
2024-10-20 09:00:03

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Pull request #10974 introduces the @bitwarden/sdk-internal dependency which is needed to build the desktop client. The dependency contains a licence statement which contains the following clause:

Namely trying to build with bitwarden_license directory removed (like we have been always doing) and sanitized node_modules results in the following:

Also see bitwarden/sdk#898. It looks like this is part of a deliberate campaign by Bitwarden, Inc. to fully transition Bitwarden to proprietary software, despite consistently advertising it as open source, without informing customers about this change.

I noticed and reported a similar problem with the NPM releases of the CLI client (#10648) two months ago, and I have yet to receive a response. Bitwarden definitely seems to be moving away from being open-source software without making any sort of announcement about it.

Leave a Comment