Back when I had a podcast, one of my early guests was a self-styled āfat activist.ā I donāt want to call her out by name here, because I consider her a dear friend, though I do think she is, and was, wrong about many things.
We had a long conversation about how she was fat 1 from a very young age, how she was always attempting diets and failing, how nothing seemed to help her lose weightāuntil finally she had an epiphany: the āpurposeā of her body wasnāt to be āskinny,ā or āattractive,ā or āfitā; it was for living in, enjoying, and serving the people around her.
I could affirm all this, of course, but then she started hammering me with factual claims that I instinctively knew were wrong: that diets ādonāt work,ā that BMI is racist and meaningless, that āhealth at every sizeā is possible, there are no ābad foods,ā that some bodies are just ānaturally fat.ā A lot of it just didnāt make basic intuitive sense (youāre telling me that thereās no downside at all to putting twice as much stress on your knees every single time you take a step?), but I wasnāt really equipped to argue with her at that momentāand, being that I myself was obese at the time, I was temperamentally inclined to at least nod along.
But Iāve been thinking about the conversation in the years since, and I think Iāve finally landed on an analogy that makes the point I wish Iād made at the time 2 : consider how conservatives and libertarians talk about climate change.